Review Policy
Our peer review process ensures rigorous, fair, and constructive evaluation of all submissions.
Peer Review Process
Shodhsanskriti follows a double-blind peer review process to ensure impartial evaluation of all submissions.
Initial Editorial Screening
- All submissions undergo initial editorial review within 2 weeks
- Manuscripts are assessed for scope, originality, methodology, and adherence to guidelines
- Authors are notified of acceptance for peer review or rejection with feedback
Peer Review Timeline
3-4
weeks
Initial Review
4-6
weeks
Revised Submission
8-10
weeks
Final Decision
Review Criteria
Reviewers evaluate manuscripts based on:
- Originality and Significance: Novel contribution to the field
- Methodology: Appropriate research design and execution
- Clarity and Organization: Clear presentation of ideas and findings
- Literature Review: Comprehensive coverage of relevant studies
- Ethical Considerations: Adherence to research ethics
- Cultural Sensitivity: Respectful treatment of cultural subjects
Reviewer Selection
- Minimum two independent reviewers per manuscript
- Reviewers selected based on expertise and absence of conflicts of interest
- International panel of experts in relevant fields
- Commitment to constructive, timely feedback
Editorial Decisions
Accept
Manuscript accepted with minor or no revisions
Minor Revisions
Specific improvements required before acceptance
Major Revisions
Substantial changes needed; re-review required
Reject
Manuscript does not meet publication standards
Appeals Process
Authors may appeal editorial decisions by submitting a detailed response within 30 days, addressing reviewer concerns and providing additional evidence or clarification.
For review-related inquiries, contact us at:
shodhsanskriti@gmail.com